Site icon swarb.co.uk

Flack v Lanzante: CA 28 Aug 2002

Renewed application for leave to appeal. Boundary dispute. Boundary agreement shown – leave refused.

Citations:

[2002] EWCA Civ 1287

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedNeilson v Poole ChD 1969
Significance of Boundary agreements
The parties, neighbours, disputed the boundary between their gardens. In a conveyance of land where the plan is stated to be for identification purposes only, the effect of those words: ‘Seems . . to confine the use of the plan to ascertaining where . .
DistinguishedPenfold and Penfold v Cooke 1978
(New Zealand) There can be no boundary agreement unless it constitutes a genuine attempt to resolve a disputed boundary line. A boundary agreement gave one party as much as three quarters of an acre of land. The court thought that the judge was not . .
MentionedBurns and Burns v Morton CA 27-May-1999
The parties disputed the line of the boundary between their neighbouring properties.
Held: The appeal failed: ‘the conveyance in respect of each property refers to the wall between the properties as being a division or dividing wall. That . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 01 October 2022; Ref: scu.217525

Exit mobile version