The claimant appealed against refusal of its challenge to the manner of implementation by the respondent of a government policy for Tax-Free Child Care.
Etherton Ch, Underhill, King LJJ
[2015] EWCA Civ 326
Bailii
Public Services Regulations 2006, Directive EU No 2004/38
England and Wales
Citing:
At first instance (1) – Edenred (UK Group) Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Treasury and Others QBD 27-Oct-2014
Challenge to change from Employer Supported Childcare scheme to Tax Free Childcare, and in particular that it would be administered by ational Savings and Investments, saying that as an outside body, that decision should have been dealt with under . .
Appeal from – Edenred (UK Group) Ltd v Her Majesty’s Treasury and Others QBD 22-Jan-2015
The claimant challenged the means of implementation of the new scheme of tax-free childcare support, saying that the 2006 Regulations should have been applied before the allocation of the administration of the new scheme had been given to the . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Edenred (UK Group) Ltd and Another v HM Treasury and Others SC 1-Jul-2015
Challenge to the decision by HM Treasury to use National Savings and Investments to deliver the Government policy of Tax-free Childcare. The claimants said that the 2006 Regulations imposed an obligation to put such contracts out to tender.
European, Administrative
Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.544994