Langley J held a ‘nominal claimant’ to be ‘one whose name is used to bring a claim in which he does not have any or at least any significant legal or beneficial interest’.
Judges:
Mr Justice Langley
Citations:
[2004] EWHC 2601 (Comm)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Compagnie Noga D’Importation et D’Exportation Sa v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. and others CA 31-Jul-2002
If the court wishes to enable a party to appeal against a particular finding contained in the judgment, it may make a declaration embodying that finding. . .
Cited by:
See Also – Compagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa and Another v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group and others ComC 24-Mar-2006
. .
See Also – Compagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd ComC 26-Jan-2007
. .
See Also – Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Compagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa and Another ComC 21-Feb-2007
Non-payment of bills of exchange – construction of settlement agreement. It was said that the compromise agreement ws unenforceable as being against public policy in restraining one party.
Held: The restraint ‘does not affect the course of . .
Cited – Tulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin Association for BSV and Others ChD 5-Jan-2022
Security required for Bitcoin claim
Two applications for security for costs. The claimant claimed against fifteen overseas residents requiring a re-write of cryotocurrency systems so that he could recover sums he said were due to him in respect of Bitcoin assets which he said have . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Banking, Litigation Practice
Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.219551