Compagnie Noga D’Importation et D’Exportation Sa v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. and others: CA 31 Jul 2002

If the court wishes to enable a party to appeal against a particular finding contained in the judgment, it may make a declaration embodying that finding.
[2002] EWCA Civ 1142, [2003] 1 WLR 307, [2003] CP Rep 5
Bailii
Civil Procedure Rules
England and Wales
Cited by:
See AlsoCompagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd and others ComC 18-Nov-2004
. .
See AlsoCompagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa and Another v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group and others ComC 24-Mar-2006
. .
See AlsoCompagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd ComC 26-Jan-2007
. .
See AlsoAustralia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Compagnie Noga D’Importation Et D’Exportation Sa and Another ComC 21-Feb-2007
Non-payment of bills of exchange – construction of settlement agreement. It was said that the compromise agreement ws unenforceable as being against public policy in restraining one party.
Held: The restraint ‘does not affect the course of . .
CitedOffice of Communications and Another v Floe Telecom Ltd CA 10-Feb-2009
The court was asked to accept an appeal against not the order made by the tribunal, but the terms of the reasoned judgment.
Held: The appeal was allowed. The Tribunal had made findings which were unnecessary to its judgment, and which were . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 February 2021; Ref: scu.282651