The extra and frequent attention to laundry for the incontinence of a claimant does not of itself warrant the provision of Attendance Allowance.
Citations:
Times 30-Jul-1996
Statutes:
Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 64(2)(a)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State for Social Services v Fairey HL 21-May-1997
The provision of an interpreter for a deaf person was included in range of care needed for attendance for Disability Living Allowance. Dealing with his soiled laundry was not so included: ‘In my opinion it is not enough to ask whether the act in . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Benefits
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.79255