Click the case name for better results:

Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer: CA 30 Jul 1996

The extra and frequent attention to laundry for the incontinence of a claimant does not of itself warrant the provision of Attendance Allowance. Citations: Times 30-Jul-1996 Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 64(2)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State … Continue reading Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer: CA 30 Jul 1996

Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State for Social Services v Fairey: HL 21 May 1997

The provision of an interpreter for a deaf person was included in range of care needed for attendance for Disability Living Allowance. Dealing with his soiled laundry was not so included: ‘In my opinion it is not enough to ask whether the act in question is done with the aim of keeping the disabled person … Continue reading Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State for Social Services v Fairey: HL 21 May 1997