Site icon swarb.co.uk

Coban v Aynur Allen F Barnes and Son (a Firm): CA 8 Oct 1996

The defendant resisted the plaintiff’s claim for personal injuries as out of time. His explanation for not pursuing inquiries with his solicitor was that he was an over-stayer who feared deportation.
Held: Having good reason to make such inquiries, it was reasonable for him to do so despite his immigration status.

Citations:

[1997] 8 Med LR 316, [1996] EWCA Civ 680

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Limitation Act 1980 14A(10)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedNash v Eli Lilly and Co CA 1993
The court considered whether a solicitor acting for a potential plaintiff was considered to be an expert for the purposes of the section.
Held: Purchas LJ said: ‘Of course as advice from a solicitor as to the legal consequences of the act or . .

Cited by:

CitedAdams v Bracknell Forest Borough Council HL 17-Jun-2004
A attended the defendant’s schools between 1977 and 1988. He had always experienced difficulties with reading and writing and as an adult found those difficulties to be an impediment in his employment. He believed them to be the cause of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Personal Injury, Limitation

Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.140547

Exit mobile version