Site icon swarb.co.uk

Brooksbank And Another v Smith: 24 Feb 1836

The testatrix died in 1818 leaving a fund in trust, subject to a life interest, for her children in equal shares, with substitutional gifts if any child predeceased her leaving issue. Her daughter Elizabeth did predecease her by two months, but on the death of the life tenant in 1827 the trustees were given incorrect information about the date of Elizabeth’s death and her share (andpound;1,000 nominal of stock) was transferred to her widower instead of to her children. When the mistake was discovered in 1833 the trustees claimed andpound;100 stock (which was all that remained unsold) from Elizabeth’s widower. The bill was issued within six years of discovery of the mistake. Alderson B held that the claim was not statute-barred. He treated it as a proprietary claim based on a mistake of fact.
Alderson B
[1836] EngR 446, (1836) 2 Y and C Ex 59, (1836) 160 ER 311
Commonlii
England and Wales
Citing:
See AlsoSmith v Brooksbank 25-Jun-1834
A bequeathed a reversionary interest, expectant on his wife’s death, in a sum of stock to B. B. bequeathed it to C., and C. bequeathed it to D, who, on the death of A’s wife, filed a bill against the trustees to have the stock transferred to him, . .
See AlsoBrooksbank v Smith 24-Feb-1836
In this case, trustees under a will, who were solicitors, had by mistake transferred stock to a person not entitled. Baron Alderson said, this being under circumstances of mistake, it appeared clear to him that the Plaintiffs were entitled to . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 26 March 2021; Ref: scu.314778 br>

Exit mobile version