References: Times 18-Apr-1913
Coram: Lush J
Light fittings were not shown by the evidence to be part of the electrical installation in a flat, and therefore were not fixtures but fittings.
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Graham Charles Botham and others -v- TSB Bank Plc CA (Bailii, [1996] EWCA Civ 549)
A flat had been repossessed by the bank. The parties disputed whether items were fixtures and charged with the land or not.
Held: The judge had correctly analysed and applied the law of fixtures and fittings. The appeal failed save to a . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 22-Jan-16 Ref: 241282