Site icon swarb.co.uk

Attorney General (on Relation of Pickfords Ltd) v Great Northern Railway Co: HL 21 Jul 1916

Where a bridge has been constructed under the Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 to carry a high road over a railway, and was originally constructed of adequate strength to carry the normal traffic of the time, is it sufficient for the railway company to maintain it of such strength, or must it provide a bridge strong enough to carry modern traffic?
Held (dis. Viscount Haldane) that they are only liable to keep it in repair as originally constructed.

Judges:

Lord Chancellor (Buckmaster), Earl Loreburn, Viscount Haldane, Lords Shaw and Sumner

Citations:

[1916] UKHL 412

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Land

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.630686

Exit mobile version