A. having a patent for certain spinning machinery, received an order
from B. to have some spinning frames made for him. A. employed C. to make
the machines for B., and informed the fatter that he had so done. After the
machines had been completed, A. ordered them to be altered. They were afterwards completed according to this new order, and packed up in boxes for B., and
C. informed B. that they were ready, but he refused to accept them : Held, that
C. could not recover the price from B. in an action for goods bargained and sold,
or for work and labour, and materials.
Citations:
[1828] EngR 12, (1828) 8 B and C 277, (1828) 108 ER 1046
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – PST Energy 7 Shipping Llc and Another v OW Bunker Malta Ltd and Another SC 11-May-2016
Parties had entered into a bunker supply contract which contained a retention of title clause in favour of the supplier. It purported to allow the buyer to use the goods before title came to be passed.
Held: The owner’s appeal failed. It did . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 18 May 2022; Ref: scu.322776