Site icon swarb.co.uk

Arrowsmith v Nottingham Trent University: CA 10 Jun 2011

The claimant appealed against an order for costs made against her after rejection of her employment claim.
Daleside lays down no point of principle of general application; that where a party lies about a central allegation in the case an award of costs must follow. Each case will be fact-sensitive.

Judges:

Laws, Richards, Rimer LJJ

Citations:

[2011] EWCA Civ 797, [2012] ICR 159

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 40

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromArrowsmith v Nottingham Trent University EAT 12-Jul-2010
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Review
Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
The Employment Tribunal did not err in refusing at a review hearing to vary its decision. The new evidence would not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Costs

Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.441629

Exit mobile version