Site icon swarb.co.uk

Akumah v London Borough of Hackney: CA 27 Nov 2001

Application for leave to appeal. The council had introduced a parking scheme for its housing estates. The resident challenged its validity saying it had been introduced by council resolution not by byelaw. Leave granted

Citations:

[2001] EWCA Civ 1946

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Full AppealAkumah v London Borough of Hackney CA 17-Apr-2002
The council imposed a parking scheme on one of the estates for which it was landlord. A tenant challenged the scheme saying it could only have been imposed by a byelaw, not a resolution.
Held: ‘section 7(1) extends the powers of a housing . .

Cited by:

Application for leaveAkumah v London Borough of Hackney CA 17-Apr-2002
The council imposed a parking scheme on one of the estates for which it was landlord. A tenant challenged the scheme saying it could only have been imposed by a byelaw, not a resolution.
Held: ‘section 7(1) extends the powers of a housing . .
CitedKilby v Basildon District Council Admn 26-Jul-2006
Tenants complained that the authority landlord had purported to vary a clause in his secure tenancy agreement which gave certain management rights to tenants.
Held: The powers to let on secure tenancies were governed by statute. The clause . .
Leavt to appeal to CAAkumah v London Borough of Hackney HL 3-Mar-2005
The authority set up a parking scheme for an estate of house of which it was the landlord. Those not displaying parking permits were to be clamped. The appellant complained that the regulations had been imposed by council resolution, not be the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Local Government

Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.218487

Exit mobile version