Site icon swarb.co.uk

Zipvit Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 27 Jun 2016

UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – Is the appellant entitled to recover VAT input tax in respect of MailmediaR supplies to it from Royal Mail, notwithstanding that Royal Mail did not in fact pay VAT on those supplies, the parties thought the supplies were exempt and the supplies were shown as VAT exempt in the invoices? No

Citations:

[2016] UKUT 294 (TCC), [2016] STC 1782, [2016] BVC 522

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

At FTTTxZipvit Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 3-Jul-2014
FTTTx VAT – supply of individually negotiated postal services treated by all parties as exempt from VAT – customer seeking to reclaim input VAT on supply from HMRC – whether services standard rated under . .

Cited by:

At UTTCZipvit Ltd v Revenue and Customs CA 29-Jun-2018
. .
At UTTCZipvit Ltd v Revenue and Customs SC 1-Apr-2020
This case is concerned with the right of a trader (in this case, Zipvit) to deduct input VAT due or paid by it on supplies of services to it by a supplier (in this case, Royal Mail), so far as those supplies are used for the trader’s own supplies of . .
At UTTCZipvit ECJ 13-Jan-2022
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right of deduction – Supply of postal services mistakenly exempted – VAT deemed to be included in the commercial price of the supply . .
At UTTCZipvit Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (No 2) SC 11-May-2022
The court considered the right of a trader to deduct input VAT due or paid by it on supplies of services to it by a supplier (RM), so far as those supplies are used for the trader’s own supplies of goods or services to an ultimate consumer. Z used . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 12 May 2022; Ref: scu.567362

Exit mobile version