Wood v West Midlands Police: QBD 8 Dec 2003

The claimant’s busness partner had been investigated by the police. He claimed in defamation after a senior officer circulated business associates and others informing them of the prosecution and suggesting the partners’s guilt. He said he was defamed by association. The partner was acquitted.
Held: Tudendhat J struck out the defence of qualified privilege as having no real prospect of success because in his judgment there was no lawful justification, still less any duty, on the chief constable to disclose the information that he did in so far as it concerned the claimant.
Tugendhat J
[2003] EWHC 2971 (QB), [2004] EMLR 17
Bailii
Cited by:
Appeal fromWood v Chief Constable West Midlands Police CA 8-Dec-2004
The claimant was a director of a limited company. A Detective Chief Inspector with responsibility for crime prevention was investigating a series of car thefts and arrested the claimant’s business partner and, before the accused had even stood his . .
CitedClift v Slough Borough Council and Another QBD 6-Jul-2009
clift_sloughQBD09
The claimant sought damages for defamation. The council had decided that she had threatened a member of staff and notified various people, and entered her name on a violent persons register. She alleged malice, the council pleaded justification and . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 14 January 2021; Ref: scu.201655