EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – 2002 Act and pre-action requirements
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
It was conceded at the appeal that the Claimant had not submitted a grievance on sexual harassment. But he sought to argue that his reason for not doing so was a threat contrary to Regulation 11(3). The EAT refused him permission to raise this new point: CELTEC applied. Even if it were allowed, the point had no prospect of success in the light of the Claimant having raised matters said to constitute the ‘threat’.
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0315 – 10 – 0112
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 31 August 2022; Ref: scu.428060