In giving their decision, the court reminded tribunals when preparing their judgments, to make sure the reasons were user friendly. Here time had been wasted with confusion about the Roman Numerals used to number the reasons.
Judges:
Mummery LJ, Chadwick LJ, Tuckey LJ
Citations:
[2005] EWCA Civ 133, Times 05-Apr-2005, [2005] IRLR 376
Links:
Statutes:
Disability Discrimination Act 1996
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – High Quality Lifestyles Ltd v Watts EAT 10-Apr-2006
EAT The Employment Tribunal had erred in its construction of direct discrimination under s3A(5) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 as amended when it failed to construct a correct hypothetical comparator . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222730