Site icon swarb.co.uk

Willford, Regina (on The Application of) v Financial Services Authority (FSA): CA 13 Jun 2013

Where a separate specialist statutory regime has been established by Parliament, there would need to be powerful reasons or exceptional circumstances to bypass that regime and permit an application for judicial review.
The Court considered and rejected an application by the appellant for the continuance of the steps taken to protect publication of his identity.

[2013] EWCA Civ 677
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromC, Regina (on The Application of) v Financial Services Authority Admn 25-May-2012
The claimant challenged by judicial review, disciplinary decisions made against him, saying tat insufficient reasons had been given. The Authority replied that judicial review was inappropriate since the claimant had open to him a reference to the . .

Cited by:
See AlsoWillford, Regina (on The Application of) v Financial Services Authority (FSA) (No 2) CA 13-Jun-2013
. .
CitedErlam and Others v Rahman and Another QBD 23-Apr-2015
The petitioners had alleged that the respondent, in his or his agent’s conduct of his campaign to be elected Mayor for Tower Hamlets in London in May 2014, had engaged in corrupt and illegal practices.
Held: The election was set aside for . .
CitedWatch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain v Charity Commission Admn 12-Dec-2014
The respondent had instigated a statutory inquiry under the 2011 Act into the claimant’s child safeguarding practices, and policies after compaints made to it. The Society now sought judicial review of that decision, and to production orders made to . .
CitedWatch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain v Charity Commission Admn 12-Dec-2014
The respondent had instigated a statutory inquiry under the 2011 Act into the claimant’s child safeguarding practices, and policies after compaints made to it. The Society now sought judicial review of that decision, and to production orders made to . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Judicial Review, Financial Services

Updated: 14 November 2021; Ref: scu.510833

Exit mobile version