The defendant was said to have copied works of the plaintiff. The court considered the defence of fair use.
Citations:
[1810] EngR 465, (1810) 17 Ves Jun 422, (1810) 34 ER 163
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – Prince Albert v Strange ChD 8-Feb-1849
The Prince sought to restrain publication of otherwise unpublished private etchings and lists of works by Queen Victoria. The etchings appeared to have been removed surreptitiously from or by one Brown. A personal confidence was claimed.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 05 May 2022; Ref: scu.335650