Site icon swarb.co.uk

Webster and Others v Liddington and Others: CA 7 May 2014

The court was asked ‘whether clinicians are responsible for statements in manufacturers’ brochures for cosmetic treatment, which they give to prospective patients without any disclaimer. The second issue is whether certain statements in those brochures constitute misrepresentations, if they fail to disclose the presence of small traces of bovine material in the substance to be administered.’

Citations:

[2014] EWCA Civ 560

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Health Professions, Contract

Updated: 05 June 2022; Ref: scu.525123

Exit mobile version