EAT Race Discrimination – Victimisation. Appeal in respect of victimisation based on incorrect application of Barton; and of unfair dismissal under both Section 99 and Section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 – we found Employment Tribunal had applied itself correctly on all matters and appeal dismissed.
EAT Race Discrimination – Victimisation.
Judges:
His Honour Judge Prophet
Citations:
UKEAT/0869/04, [2005] UKEAT 0869 – 04 – 0203
Links:
Statutes:
Employment Rights Act 1996 98 99
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Qua v John Ford Morrison (Solicitors) EAT 14-Jan-2003
The claimant appealed the refusal of her claim for a finding that her dismissal was automatically unfair. She had been employed for less than a year, and had taken several absences to care for her child. She claimed protection saying that her . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Employment
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225909