Site icon swarb.co.uk

Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins, Same v Carell: CA 10 Dec 1999

The presence of cooking facilities is an essential element in deciding whether premises could constitute a dwelling. Accordingly, a room in a hotel without such facilities could not be subject to an assured tenancy. A room with cooking facilities and access to a bathroom could be a dwelling, but the sharing of cooking facilities denied exclusive possession. Changes in circumstances did not operate to remove the necessity for cooking facilities to constitute a dwelling.

Citations:

Times 10-Dec-1999, Gazette 07-Jan-2000

Statutes:

Housing Act 1988 1(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromUratemp Ventures Limited v Collins HL 11-Oct-2001
Can a single room within a hotel comprise a separate dwelling within the 1988 Act and be subject to an assured tenancy?
Held: A single room can be a dwelling. Each case must be interpreted in its own light as a question of fact, but respecting . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Housing, Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.90091

Exit mobile version