Whether the Claimant was told he could not apply to view or rent three properties being marketed by the Defendant because he was on housing benefit or in receipt of ‘DSS benefits’. If the Claimant could establish the factual premise, the issue was whether it amounted to the application of a provision, criterion or practice and if it was indirectly discriminatory pursuant to s.19(2) of the Act.
Judges:
Her Honour Judge Stacey
Citations:
[2020] EW Misc 30 (CC)
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Discrimination
Updated: 06 December 2022; Ref: scu.659384