Site icon swarb.co.uk

Turner v Railton: 1796

Evidence was admitted that the defendant’s former attorney had admitted the debt claimed and made an offer on the defendant’s behalf to pay a certain sum on account. Lord Kenyon said: ‘Concessions made for the purpose of settling the business for which the action is brought, cannot be given in evidence; but facts admitted I have always received.’

Judges:

Lord Kenyon

Citations:

(1796) 2 Esp 474

Cited by:

CitedBradford and Bingley Plc v Rashid HL 12-Jul-2006
Disapplication of Without Prejudice Rules
The House was asked whether a letter sent during without prejudice negotiations which acknowledged a debt was admissible to restart the limitation period. An advice centre, acting for the borrower had written, in answer to a claim by the lender for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.243126

Exit mobile version