The applicant, failed asylum seeker, appealed against an order for his removal, saying that it would interfere with his right to family wife by removing him from his wife and daughter.
Held: The applicant had not given any independent evidence of the existence of the wide and daughter he said existed, nor any explanation for the absence of such evidence, and the court had not erred in law in taking that as a basis for rejecting his claim.
Waller LJ, Thomas LJ, Moore-Bick LJ
[2009] EWCA Civ 40, Times 09-Apr-2009
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 8
England and Wales
Immigration, Human Rights
Updated: 27 December 2021; Ref: scu.280445