Site icon swarb.co.uk

Tinkler and Another v Elliott: CA 7 May 2014

The defendant appealed against permission given to the claimant to bring allegations of contempt of court. The claimant was acting in person.

Arden, Gloster, Christopher Clarke LJJ
[2014] EWCA Civ 564
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See AlsoTinkler and Another v Elliott CA 7-Jul-2011
Application for leave to appeal. Litigant in person failing to understand CPR. Leave granted. . .
See AlsoTinkler and Another v Elliott QBD 15-Mar-2012
The defendant, subject to a civil restraint order, sought leave to appeal against judgment entered against him in his absence. . .
See AlsoTinkler and Another v Elliott CA 10-Oct-2012
The claimant was a litigant in person who said that he had misunderstood the relevant provision of the CPR.
Maurice Kay LJ said: ‘I accept that there may be facts and circumstances in relation to a litigant in person which may go to an . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contempt of Court

Updated: 03 December 2021; Ref: scu.525122

Exit mobile version