Times Newspapers Ltd and others v Armstrong: CA 13 Jun 2006

May LJ noted: ‘an action which does not come within section 69(1) has to be tried without a jury, unless the court in its discretion orders it to be tried with a jury. The discretion is now very rarely exercised, reflecting contemporary practice. Contemporary practice has an eye, among other things, to proportionality; the greater predictability of the decision of a professional judge; and the fact that a judge gives reasons’.

Judges:

Lord Justice Dyson Lord Justice May

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Civ 519, [2006] 1 WLR 2462

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Senior Courts Act 1981

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See alsoArmstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd and others QBD 17-Dec-2004
Eady J said: ‘repetitive and loose talk about questions can convey the impression there are reasonable grounds to suspect.’ . .
See alsoArmstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd and David Walsh, Alan English CA 29-Jul-2005
The claimant sought damages after publication by the first defendant of articles which it was claimed implied that he had taken drugs. The paper claimed qualified privilege, and claimed Reynolds immunity.
Held: The defence of qualified . .
See alsoArmstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd and others QBD 7-Dec-2005
. .

Cited by:

CitedCook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd QBD 29-Mar-2011
The claimant, an MP, complained in defamation of the defendant’s description of his rejected expenses claim regarding an assistant’s charitable donation. The paper pleaded a Reynolds defence. The claimant said that when published the defendant knew . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Defamation, Litigation Practice

Updated: 06 September 2022; Ref: scu.242464