Site icon swarb.co.uk

The Queen v King: 1962

[Supreme Court of Canada] Without appreciating the risk, the defendant drove a car whilst suffering from the after-effects of a medicinal drug which induced a state in which he might suddenly be unable to know what he was doing.
Held: His appeal against a conviction of driving while his ability to drive was impaired succeeded. Without his own fault, the defendant lacked the mental element to make his driving an offence.

Citations:

[1962] SCR 746

Jurisdiction:

Canada

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Kingston HL 22-Jul-1994
Involuntary Intoxication not a General Defence
The prosecutor appealed an acquittal on appeal of the defendant for sexual assault, saying that he had not had the necessary intent because of intoxication through drink and drugs. He said that a co-defendant had secretly administered drugs to him. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Commonwealth, Crime

Updated: 05 May 2022; Ref: scu.272899

Exit mobile version