Site icon swarb.co.uk

The King v G Gaskin, D D: 17 Apr 1799

A return (to a mandamus to restore) insufficient, because it did not state that the party had been summoned to answer to the charge before he was removed,
[1799] EngR 682, (1799) 8 TR 209, (1799) 101 ER 1349
Commonlii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedRidge v Baldwin (No 1) HL 14-Mar-1963
No Condemnation Without Opportunity For Defence
Ridge, a Chief Constable, had been wrongfully dismissed because he was not given the opportunity of presenting his defence. He had been acquitted of the charges brought against him, but the judge at trial had made adverse comments about his . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 October 2021; Ref: scu.348509 br>

Exit mobile version