The Duke of Bedford v The Trustees of The British Museum: 6 Jul 1822

Where land is conveyed in fee, by deed of feoffment, subject to a perpetual ground rent, and the feoffee covenants for himself, his heirs and assigns, with the feoffor, the owner of adjoining lands, his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, not to use the land in a particular manner, with a view to the more ample enjoyment by the feoffor of such adjoining lands, and the subsequent acts of the feoffor, or of those claiming under him, have so altered the character and condition of the adjoining lands that, with reference to the land conveyed, the restriction in the covenant ceases to be applicable according to the intent and spirit of the contract, a Court of Equity will not interpose to enforce the covenant but will leave the parties to law.
Whether upon such a covenant there could be any remedy at law against the assigns of the covenantor, quaere.

Judges:

Lord Eldon

Citations:

[1822] EngR 457, (1822) 2 My and K 552, (1822) 39 ER 1055

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedTulk v Moxhay 22-Dec-1848
Purchaser with notice bound in Equity
A, being seised of the centre garden and some houses in Leicester Square, conveyed the garden to B in fee, and B covenanted for himself and his assigns to keep the garden unbuilt upon.
Held: A purchaser from B, with notice of the covenant, was . .
See AlsoThe Duke of Bedford v British Museum 6-Jul-1822
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.329350