The complainant has requested information in relation to the council and legal definitions. Teignbridge District Council provided some information and explained that it did not hold any further information in relation to question 1 and no information in relation to question 2. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities, Teignbridge District Council is correct to state that it does not hold any further information in relation to question 1 and no information in relation to question 2. The Commissioner therefore considers that it has not breached section 1 (right to information) of the FOIA. The Commissioner does not require Teignbridge District Council to take any steps as a result of this decision.
FOI 1: Complaint not upheld
References: [2020] UKICO fs50889706
Links: Bailii
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 23 September 2020; Ref: scu.653798 br>