Site icon swarb.co.uk

Tanner v Customs and Excise: Excs 20 Feb 2003

EXCISE DUTY – Appeal heard in the absence of the Appellant under VAT Tribunals Rules, Rule 26(2) – Appeal under s.16 FA 1994 against a review decision not to offer seized excise goods for restoration – imported excise goods allegedly concealed in a manner appearing to be intended to deceive an officer; s.49(1)(f) CEMA – R on the application of Hoverspeed and Others v CCE considered – held that the Appellant had not shown that either the decision not to offer the goods for restoration or the review decision was unreasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2003] UKVAT-Excise E00388

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See AlsoTanner v Customs and Excise Excs 26-Mar-2004
RESTORATION – Goods only seized – Goods alleged to have been hidden in van – Customs evidence confused and contradictory – Whether review decision based thereon reasonable – No – Further review directed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271486

Exit mobile version