The court considered a claim in breach of warranty and misrepresentation in a share purchase transaction.
Held: There had been no representation as suggested, and therefore no misrepresentation. There had however been a breach of warranty.
Mann J
[2012] EWHC 3443 (Ch)
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Sycamore Bidco Ltd v Breslin and Another ChD 17-Jan-2013
. .
Principal judgment – Sycamore Bidco Ltd v Breslin and Another ChD 14-Feb-2013
The court considered whether it was correct to award interest on the sum of damages for the period before as well as after judgment, and if so, from what date and at what rate of interest.. . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 June 2021; Ref: scu.466436 br>