Interlocutory appeal against refusal to make order requiring release of tribunal chairman’s notes.
Held: The appeal succeeded. It was clear that there was a factual dispute as to the events of the hearing, and ‘it is the Chairman’s notes which represent the formal record of the proceedings and not the parties’ notes, unless there is a dispute over the accuracy of the Chairman’s notes. On the face of the pleadings in the appeal, to which I have referred, there is a difference of recollection between the parties as to how the case was put below; that issue, in my judgment, can only be satisfactorily resolved by recourse to the relevant Chairman’s notes.’
Peter Clarke J
[2002] UKEAT 0765 – 01 – 1106
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Stephen Fidler and Co v Kapadia EAT 20-Sep-2001
Leave to appeal granted . .
Cited by:
See Also – Stephen Fidler and Co v Kapadia EAT 2-Oct-2002
EAT Unfair Dismissal – Contributory fault. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 September 2021; Ref: scu.202951 br>