Site icon swarb.co.uk

Stanbury v Exeter Corporation: 1905

An action was brought against the corporation for the negligence of an inspector who, acting under the 1894 Act seized and detained sheep suspected of sheep-scab.
Held: The corporation was not liable. The inspector was performing a function imposed directly upon him by statute; it was a function that was, for him, and not the corporation, to perform.
Lord Alverstone CJ
[1905] 2 KB 838
Diseases of Animals Act 1894
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedMatuszczyk v National Coal Board 1953
The pursuer sought damages at common law after being injured by a shot-firing by a co-worker. The pursuer based his case on duties said to be owed to him by the shot-firer at common law. The defenders’ argument was that these duties had been . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 August 2021; Ref: scu.241428 br>

Exit mobile version