Site icon swarb.co.uk

South East Leisure Group Ltd v Vachoumis: EAT 4 Oct 2011

EAT Practice and Procedure : Case Management
Right to be heard
The Employment Tribunal by oversight did not respond to the Appellant’s application for a review of its debarment for want of a timely ET3. The Employment Judge did not follow the EAT’s direction to make a decision on the application prior to the full hearing. The Appellant did not have a hearing. It was conceded the Employment Judge would be bound to order a review. As he had not done so, the appeal would be allowed and the Employment Tribunal directed to accept the ET3 and hold a full hearing.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 0270 – 10 – 0410

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.449411

Exit mobile version