The defendants sought to appeal orders restraining them from the use of their land for residential purposes, and were awaiting the outcome of their appeal. They now appealed against the enforcement of committal orders for their breaches of the order.
Held: The committal orders should not be suspended pending the outcome of the appeals. The restraint orders remained in effect, and should be complied with. The defendants chances of success in the appeal might have improved, but that was not the issue.
Judges:
Ward LJ, Latham LJ, lloyd LJ
Citations:
Times 22-May-2006, [2006] EWCA Civ 493
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – South Bedfordshire District Council v Price and others QBD 23-Sep-2005
. .
Cited by:
Cited – Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb and Others QBD 27-Jun-2011
The Council applied for the committal of the defendant for an alleged breach of a without notice injunction. Notice of the injunction had been placed at the site, requiring nobody to move caravans onto the land.
Held: The application . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Planning, Contempt of Court
Updated: 29 August 2022; Ref: scu.242882