Site icon swarb.co.uk

Smith v Sydney: 1871

A sequestration order, while in force, was a valid order providing legal protection to those who had obtained it and acted upon it. The court made a distinction between acts of the court and the acts of the parties.

Citations:

(1871) QB 203

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedTombstone Ltd v Raja and Another; Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others (No 9) CA 17-Dec-2008
The claimant complained of an irregularly obtained judgment. The defendant had obtained an amendment to a writ of sequestration in the course of a bitterly fought dispute bewteen the defendant and the owner of the claimant. The judge had found the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.279790

Exit mobile version