Site icon swarb.co.uk

Smith v Greenwich Council and Others: EAT 24 Aug 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Withdrawal
Costs
Whether it was open to Employment Tribunal to dismiss Claimant’s claims on withdrawal under ET rule 28. It was not on facts found. Observations on the application of r27(5) where Claimant abandoned the hearing. Appeal against withdrawal judgment allowed, together with consequential costs order.

Citations:

[2010] UKEAT 0113 – 10 – 2408

Links:

Bailii

Employment

Updated: 28 August 2022; Ref: scu.426695

Exit mobile version