UTIAC (i) The Secretary of State’s generic evidence, combined with her evidence particular to these two appellants, sufficed to discharge the evidential burden of proving that their TOEIC certificates had been procured by dishonesty.
(ii) However, given the multiple frailties from which this generic evidence was considered to suffer and, in the light of the evidence adduced by the appellants, the Secretary of State failed to discharge the legal burden of proving dishonesty on their part.
McCloskey P J
[2016] UKUT 229 (IAC)
Bailii
England and Wales
Immigration
Updated: 09 November 2021; Ref: scu.565670