Site icon swarb.co.uk

Slivenko v Latvia: ECHR 9 Oct 2003

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+8 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 5-4 ; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award

Citations:

48321/99, [2003] ECHR 498, [2003] ECHR 498, [2009] ECHR 2246

Links:

Worldlii, Bailii, Bailii

Human Rights

Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.186651

Exit mobile version