Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Simmenthal v Commission: ECJ 22 May 1978

Citations:

C-92/78, [1978] EUECJ C-92/78R, [1979] EUECJ C-92/78

Links:

European

Updated: 21 May 2022; Ref: scu.132687

Posted on May 22, 2022May 22, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: V v Commission: ECJ 14 Jun 1979

Next Next post: Commission v Germany: ECJ 12 Jul 1979

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Jenkins, Regina v: CACD 29 Jan 2015
Amin, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (IJR): UTIAC 26 Feb 2015
AK and SK (Christians: Risk) Pakistan (CG): UTIAC 15 Dec 2014
Tyrer v Retirement Care Group Ltd Om Property Management No 2 Ltd, (Midlands): FTTPC 9 Sep 2014
Bowditch v Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 30 Nov 2012
Idris, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for The Home Department (IJR): UTIAC 4 Feb 2015
MM (Darfuris) Sudan (CG): UTIAC 5 Jan 2015
Edwards v Information Commissioer: FTTGRC 16 Oct 2012
Newbery v Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 8 Nov 2012
Block 5 Chapman Square – Wandsworth : London: LVT 15 Oct 2015
Block 4 Chapman Square – Wandsworth : London: LVT 15 Oct 2015
Chapman v Sutton (London): FTTPC 2 Feb 2016
AH v CD and Others: FD 19 Jul 2018
Dickinson and Others: FTTPC 31 Aug 2018
Hermens v Hermens and Another: FD 15 Dec 2017
LKH v TQA Al Z (Interim Maintenance and Pound for Pound Costs Funding): FD 24 Jul 2018
59 Cottage Grove RTM Company Limited v Christie Estates Southern Limited (Southern : Right To Manage Part 2): FTTPC 16 Dec 2014
Harkin v Brendan Kearney and Company, Solicitors and Others: CANI 4 Dec 2015
Kotsev v The Sofia District Public Prosecutor’s Office (A Bulgarian Judicial Authority): Admn 16 Nov 2018
Duarte v The Comarca De Lisboa (A Portuguese Judicial Authority): Admn 9 Nov 2018
Welex Ag v Rosa Maritime Ltd: CA 14 Jan 2003
Mirador International Llc v MF Global UK Ltd: CA 13 Dec 2012
Newman v Framewood Manor Management Company Ltd: CA 19 Oct 2012
HTC Corporation v Gemalto Sa: CA 22 Oct 2014
Sunrise Brokers Llp v Rodgers: CA 23 Oct 2014
K v The Hospital Managers of The Kingswood Centre and Another: CA 23 Oct 2014
The Woodland Trust v Loring and Others: CA 16 Oct 2014
Rees and Another v Gateley Wareing (A Firm) and Others: CA 22 Oct 2014
Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester Lng, Ltd: CA 22 Oct 2014
Tek-Dek Limited and Flexiteek International A/S (Patent): IPO 3 Jan 2014
MJP Media Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 Jul 2010
HM (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 7 Jan 2014
Deakins (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 30 Sep 2014
Pirate’s Grog (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 7 Aug 2014
Cachet Kids (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 18 Sep 2014
Zam-Buk Series of 6 (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 21 Oct 2008
Wimbledon Gin Co (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 22 Apr 2014
Shahabi-Shack, Regina v: CACD 11 Dec 2014
Church’s Got Talent (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 26 Sep 2014
Hung v Gardiner: 6 May 2003
McCann v Dungannon and South Tyrone District Borough Council: FENI 5 Aug 2009
Regina v Bernard Saunders: 1837
HM Revenue and Customs v J M Gorry and Son: CANI 20 Feb 2009
CPG Logistics Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 23 Jul 2010
Lindop v Agus and Others: ChD 2 Jul 2009
Davda v Bross Bennett Solicitors and Others: ChD 25 Jun 2009
Wasabi Frog Ltd v Boo Ltd and Another: ChD 4 Nov 2009
William Hastings Ryland v Alexander Maurice Delisle: 6 Jul 1869
Re Liberty International Plc: ChD 16 Jun 2010
Infinity Distribution Ltd (In Administration) v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 11 Jun 2010

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.