Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Preliminary objection rejected (abuse of process); Violation of Art. 11; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 9; Not necessary to examine Art. 10; Not necessary to examine Art. 14; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings
[1998] ECHR 55, 26695/95
Worldlii, Bailii
Human Rights
Updated: 30 August 2021; Ref: scu.165636 br>