Sharma v London Borough of Ealing: EAT 5 Jan 2006

EAT Order for costs of failed unfair dismissal claims/discrimination claims by senior employee found by Tribunal to have been untruthful; he found guilty of gross misconduct. Costs were to be assessed by the County Court; the Respondent’s bill before assessment was andpound;130,000. Were Tribunal’s reasons for costs order sufficient and compliant with the new requirements of Rule 30(6) of Schedule 1 to 2004 Regulations? Answer – yes, appeal dismissed.


J Burke QC


[2006] UKEAT 0399 – 05 – 0501




England and Wales

Employment, Costs

Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238253