Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Shagabutdinov v Russia: ECHR 13 Dec 2016

51389/07 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Third Section Committee)), [2016] ECHR 1097
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights

Human Rights

Updated: 27 January 2022; Ref: scu.572383

Posted on January 27, 2022January 27, 2022 by dlsPosted in Human RightsTagged Human Rights

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Mandic-Bozic, Regina (on The Application of) v British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy and Another: Admn 7 Dec 2016
Next Next post: Prym and Prym Consumer v Commission: ECJ 3 Sep 2009

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,511)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (307)
  • Commercial (1,420)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (948)
  • Construction (1,169)
  • Consumer (739)
  • Contempt of Court (823)
  • Contract (6,113)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,546)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,314)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,785)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,627)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,721)
  • Environment (815)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,941)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,587)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,521)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (1,998)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,353)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,623)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,043)
  • Insurance (1,247)
  • Intellectual Property (13,532)
  • International (955)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,046)
  • Jury (1,497)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,656)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,064)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,757)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,906)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,618)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (821)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,758)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Euro-Diam Ltd v Bathurst: CA 1988
  • Alexander v Home Office: CA 1988
  • Picea Holdings Ltd v London Rent Assessment Panel: QBD 1971
  • In re Rapier (Deceased): QBD 1988
  • Ibrahim v Redbridge London Borough Council: QBD 17 Dec 2002
  • Bayview Motors Ltd v Mitsui Marine and Fire Insurance Company Ltd and others: CA 7 Nov 2002
  • Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1981
  • North Cornwall District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another: QBD 28 Oct 2002
  • Regina (Giles) v Fareham Borough Council: QBD 13 Dec 2002
  • Regina (Sim) v Parole Board: CA 18 Dec 2003
  • Simmers and others vInnes for an Order Under Section 461 of the Companies Act 1985: OHCS 17 Dec 2003
  • British Telecommunications plc v Reid: CA 6 Oct 2003
  • Re Consort Deep Level Gold Mines ex parte Stark: 1897
  • Avis Bennett (James Bennet’s Representatives) v the Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel for Judicial Review To Refuse Compensation: OHCS 9 Dec 2003
  • Van Aken v Camden London Borough Council: CA 11 Oct 2002
  • Regina (Hale) v Southport Justices: QBD 14 Jan 2002
  • Can v Turkey: ECHR 5 Dec 2000
  • B and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v Leeds School Organisation Committee: QBD 13 Sep 2002
  • Briffett v Director of Public Prosecutions; Bradshaw v Director of Public Prosecutions: QBD 6 Nov 2001
  • Citibank NA v Ercole Ltd and Others: QBD 24 May 2001
  • Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Venn and Others: QBD 11 Dec 2001
  • McQuade v Chief Constable of Humberside Police: CA 12 Jul 2001
  • Regina (T and Another) v Secretary of State for Health and Another: QBD 29 Jul 2002
  • Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v ASDA Stores Ltd and Another: QBD 24 Jun 2002
  • Kulek v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 14 Oct 2002
  • Community Housing Association Limited v Masri and Masri: CA 15 May 1997
  • Regina v Knightsbridge Crown Court ex parte Brookner: Admn 29 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Essex County Council ex parte Tarmac Roadstone Holdings Limited: Admn 29 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Arts Council of England ex parte Women’s Playhouse Trust: Admn 29 Jul 1997
  • South Hams District Council v Secretary of State for Environment; Wheeler and Wheeler: Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Social Security ex parte Gary Barrows: Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Ouma: Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Mary Sabea Afunyah (Nee Ababio): Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Northamptonshire County Council ex parte ‘W’: Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting: Admn 18 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Joseph Robert Hurley: Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Gloucestershire County Council (ex parte Prospects Care Services): Admn 28 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Peries: Admn 25 Jul 1997
  • Regina v St Edmundsbury Housing Benefit Review Board ex parte Sandys: Admn 24 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Institute of Chartered Accountants In England and Wales ex parte Victor Benjamin Christie: Admn 24 Jul 1997
  • Chesterfield Properties Plc v Secretary of State for Environment; Secretary of State for Transport and Stockton-On-Tees Borough Council: Admn 24 Jul 1997
  • Beaulieu Property Management Limited v Secretary of State for Environment: Admn 24 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Cleeland: Admn 22 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Emmanuel Muyiva Sobanjo: Admn 21 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Wandsworth ex parte Hemadri Dodia: Admn 18 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Immigration Appellate Authority ex parte Sadhu Singh: Admn 18 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ex parte Singh: Admn 18 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Head Teacher of Fairfield Primary School Governors of Fairfield Primary School Hampshire County Council ex parte ‘W’: Admn 18 Jul 1997
  • Regina v Lord Chancellor’s Department; Special Adjudicator and Immigration Appeals Authority, Birmingham ex parte Ul Anwar Haq: Admn 17 Jul 1997
  • Regina v London Borough of Newham ex parte Ayse Hassan: Admn 17 Jul 1997

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.