Shackell v Rosier; 22 Apr 1836

References: , [1836] EngR 613, (1836) 2 Bing NC 635, (1836) 132 ER 245
Links: Commonlii
Coram: Tindall CJ
In consideration that Plaintiff had published a libel at Defendant’s request, and had at the like request consented to defend an action brought against Plaintiff for such publication, Defendant promised to indemnify Plaintiff from the costs of the action : Held, that the promise was void.
This case is cited by:

(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 01-Nov-15 Ref: 314945