Site icon swarb.co.uk

Shackell v Rosier: 22 Apr 1836

In consideration that Plaintiff had published a libel at Defendant’s request, and had at the like request consented to defend an action brought against Plaintiff for such publication, Defendant promised to indemnify Plaintiff from the costs of the action : Held, that the promise was void.

Judges:

Tindall CJ

Citations:

[1836] EngR 613, (1836) 2 Bing NC 635, (1836) 132 ER 245

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedLes Laboratoires Servier and Another v Apotex Inc and Others SC 29-Oct-2014
Ex turpi causa explained
The parties had disputed the validity a patent and the production of infringing preparations. The english patent had failed and damages were to be awarded, but a Canadian patent remained the defendant now challenged the calculation of damages for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Torts – Other, Contract

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.314945

Exit mobile version