EAT Practice and Procedure – New evidence on appeal
Practice and Procedure – 2002 Act and pre-action requirements
The Appellant wished to adduce new evidence (which would have been available below) to contradict a statement in the ET1 which had not been controverted in the ET3 and despite having been given (but not taken) the opportunities of an adjournment to adduce evidence by the ET. Refused.
ET construed the Respondent’s letter in its context as sufficiently raising a grievance. Entitled to do so. No error of law.
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0519 – 06 – 1912, UKEAT/0519/06
Links:
Employment
Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.248314