Site icon swarb.co.uk

Senior v Holdsworth: 1976

A subpoena requiring the production of documents had been served.
Held: A witness ought not to be required to comply with a letter of request if it appeared to the court ‘that the request is irrelevant, or fishing, or speculative, or oppressive’.

Judges:

Lord Denning MR

Citations:

[1976] QB 23

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedIn re State of Norway’s Application (No 1) CA 1987
There were taxation proceedings in Norway. One question was whether the Norwegian taxpayer controlled a trust which owned some shares. Letters rogatory issued by the Norwegian Court requested the oral examination of two witnesses in the United . .
CitedFirst American Corporation and others v Sheik Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others CA 12-May-1998
Letters of Request had been received for the production of document to be used in litigation in the US. It was complained that they were drafted so widely as to amount to a fishing expedition.
Held: ‘an English court must look at the issue of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 25 November 2022; Ref: scu.188697

Exit mobile version