Whether a distinction could be drawn between, on the one hand, a decision to make a deportation order and the making of the order, and, on the other, the decision to detain. It was argued that a flaw in the decision to make a deportation order/the making of the order did not impact upon the lawfulness of the decision to detain.
Held: The argument was accepted.
Judges:
Lord Justice Pill
Lord Justice Sullivan
And
Lord Justice Kitchin
Citations:
[2012] EWCA Civ 842
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Wrongly Decided – DN (Rwanda), Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 26-Feb-2020
Challenge to deportation of successful asylum applicant on release from prison after conviction of an offence specified under the 2004 Order as a particularly serious crime. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.460567